Is the cost of ownership really as high as I think

RobberRog

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Atlanta
Visit site
Here's an interesting thought for you cost accountants out there - some of my journeys I can claim mileage from my employer/client. HMRC (US = IRS?) claim guidelines are £.24/mile for a bike and £.40 for a car. Say I do 10,00 business miles a year. Would I be "better off" taking the bike or the car?
For purely tax deduction purposes, drive your car.
 
Last edited:

coachestabrook

Junior Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Fort Worth, Texas
Visit site
I bought my bike in Feb '09 with 3,300 miles. I had wanted a bike for years but couldn't justify the cost of such a luxury/toy. I did the math and figured out a bike would pay for itself in what I would save in gas with a 50 mile round-trip commute everyday.

At 8,500 miles, after replacing the tires and getting shocked by the price of an oil change (which I now do myself), I calculated my cost of ownership. At $189 per month P&I, $35 per month insurance and figuring in the tires and oil, plus fuel used in that 5,200 miles, I came out $90 cheaper than the cost of operating my paid for F150. The costs for the pickup were for fuel and oil only. My huge cost was the tires, but I replaced them with Michelin Power Pilot 2TC tires that have awesome grip in the twisties and still have half tread with 10,000 miles on them. And I now have a bike, which I didn't before.
 
Top