One of the reasons gap could be twice as important on our bike is it uses 2 coils for 4 spark plugs. One coil for #1 and #4 cylinder and one coil for #2 and #3 cylinder. What happens is the coil fires at TDC and the end of the exhaust stroke for each piston that is mechanically at TDC and end of exhaust stroke. In other words pistons #2 and #3 are both in the same position in the cylinder but they are at opposites in firing and exhaust. One being the end of compression and beginning of power. The other cylinder would be the end of exhaust and beginning of the intake. So the coil is firing twice as many times as a coil that is dedicated to one cylinder. Dielectrically there is more stress on the coil pack because the path for it's spark has been increased. It is more likely to create corona (with increased gap) internally and break down internally or when there is an insulation problem it may more readily take that path and not produce a strong or weak spark where we want it. The coils are looking a 2 plugs... Be careful setting the Iridiums!
Set your gap to factory specs!
What it really lacks by design is saturation time. At 14,000 RPM that doesn't leave much time with "waste spark system" so its very likely coil output energy is weak at high RPM. Remember its not just a spark and there is current factor. Hence the reason the gap is so critical.
Just an observation but Yama may have learned something over the years as the 09 does not use the "K" plug with the double ground strap side fire electrode. Also NGK calls for less gap on the CR9E single ground strap plug (conventional plug) 0.028" vs 0.032" on the K version.
POINT; the CR9EK is gapped at 0.032" The spec for our bike is 0.6–0.7 mm (0.024–0.028 in). be sure to correct this before installing your plugs!
EDIT:
I'm curious if the ECM/Coil packs would be OK without the resistor Plug CAP or would this impair them or something like the instrument cluster from the EMI noise emitted either radiant or back into the connecting wires? I might remove the interanl resistor in the cap and see what happens! Why you ask? Because I can feel when the plug wires get loose in the caps. Not to thread derail, but I'm curious if there is anything to be gained by removing the inline resistor to get more energy to the plug?
The Downside:
The resistor cap and plug add 10K and 5K of resistance. This drops the current delivered to the plug. By reducing the current, there is less electrical noise emitted by the ignition system, more heat generated by the resistance and less energy delivered to the plug (think in terms of current here). But its very likely the load in watts goes down with these resistors in place and the ECM or Coils may lack the balls to run without the series resistors. So this could all go horrible wrong and lead to a misfire. You see what I don't know is if the ECU and Coil packs have the energy to run w/out that 10K resistor plug cap?
If this was purely from a noise suppression iussue it seems a better choice would have been a shielded plug wire as the CAP and plug are shielded (EMI wise) by being recessed in the head. I just don't see why they did both? The head is canceling the radiant EMI however there is an exposed wire that's acting like an antenna as its a solid core non-suppression wire tossing out EMI noise everywhere. So it almost seems like they did it for the sake of keeping the energy demand low.
I guess my point is the coil output is so feeble with a mere 0.028" max gap that it needs all the energy it can muster at the plugs gap. Hint most HEI coils fire plugs gapped at 0.50" or better these days so this seems weak!
Thoughts anyone?
Other things of interest:
NGK DENSO BOSCH BRISK SPARK PLUG TEST - YouTube
Some thoughts on Ethonal based fuel.
NGK Spark Plugs USA
Read up on this:
NGK Spark Plugs USA
NGK sparkplugs information and specification
08 and lower
CR9EK // 4548 //
OEM Gap = 0.032" // Iriduim # CR9EIX gap 0.032"
09
CR9E // 6263 //
OEM Gap = 0.028" // Iriduim # CR9EIX gap 0.028" //
single ground wire
While here lets throw Torque Spec:
17.5 Nm (1.75 m·kgf, 12.7 ft·lbf)