Doorag
Senior Member
As I have mentioned before, I'm considering moving up to a bigger bike so I took the day off and went on two test rides today - a 2007 Triumph Daytona 955i and a 2007 Triumph Sprint ST.
Here's what the Daytona looks like.
Here's what the Sprint ST looks like.
The Daytona has a 955cc triple and the Sprint ST has a 1050cc triple. Essentially the same engine.
Here are my thoughts.
1. There really wasn't too much difference between them and the Fazer, to be honest. Maybe I was expecting a litre bike to be a lot more powerful than either of these bikes but I was surprised at how 'normal' they both felt. Is this normal? I understand that neither of them are 180bph superbikes, but I did expect a bit more from them.
2. I'm too fat and old to deal with a 'sporty' riding position. The Daytona looks great but even after 15 minutes of riding my right wrist (old basketball injury) and lower back were killing me. I reckon that if I stuck with it for a few months I'd get used to it, but I'm not at a point in my life where I'm willing to suffer that much.
3. The Sprint ST has a 'heat problem'. The barsteward nearly roasted my right calf! It has an under-seat exhaust like the Fazer, but the pipe runs on the right side close to the rider's leg and MAN it gets HOT. I searched the Triumph forum about it and found out that it's a common complaint - so much so that people are REALLY tired of people asking about it. (Sort of like "the oil question" on here.) SO my question to those of you who have had fared, litre bikes before - is high heat normal on bikes like that? Is the Fazer unusually cool?
Those are the major thoughts. I didn't buy either one of them and probably wouldn't in the future either. The Sprint ST is a lovely bike set up much more for touring of the sport/touring type but it does have an excellent engine sound - especially on the overrun. I wonder if they designed it that way? The heat issue is just too much for me to get over at the moment. If everyone comes back and says, "Yep, that's how all big-engined, faired bikes are." then I might give it another thought but I'd rather try a few other things first.
The Daytona was the first 'sport' bike I have been on and after getting used to the very forward feeling riding position I started to like it - until my srist and back started up. It also didn't seem nearly as quick as it should have. Maybe some dyno time and some TLC would sort it out a bit, but I thought it was a bit flat for what it is/was supposed to be.
Anyway, that's all for now. Any thoughts??
Here's what the Daytona looks like.
Here's what the Sprint ST looks like.
The Daytona has a 955cc triple and the Sprint ST has a 1050cc triple. Essentially the same engine.
Here are my thoughts.
1. There really wasn't too much difference between them and the Fazer, to be honest. Maybe I was expecting a litre bike to be a lot more powerful than either of these bikes but I was surprised at how 'normal' they both felt. Is this normal? I understand that neither of them are 180bph superbikes, but I did expect a bit more from them.
2. I'm too fat and old to deal with a 'sporty' riding position. The Daytona looks great but even after 15 minutes of riding my right wrist (old basketball injury) and lower back were killing me. I reckon that if I stuck with it for a few months I'd get used to it, but I'm not at a point in my life where I'm willing to suffer that much.
3. The Sprint ST has a 'heat problem'. The barsteward nearly roasted my right calf! It has an under-seat exhaust like the Fazer, but the pipe runs on the right side close to the rider's leg and MAN it gets HOT. I searched the Triumph forum about it and found out that it's a common complaint - so much so that people are REALLY tired of people asking about it. (Sort of like "the oil question" on here.) SO my question to those of you who have had fared, litre bikes before - is high heat normal on bikes like that? Is the Fazer unusually cool?
Those are the major thoughts. I didn't buy either one of them and probably wouldn't in the future either. The Sprint ST is a lovely bike set up much more for touring of the sport/touring type but it does have an excellent engine sound - especially on the overrun. I wonder if they designed it that way? The heat issue is just too much for me to get over at the moment. If everyone comes back and says, "Yep, that's how all big-engined, faired bikes are." then I might give it another thought but I'd rather try a few other things first.
The Daytona was the first 'sport' bike I have been on and after getting used to the very forward feeling riding position I started to like it - until my srist and back started up. It also didn't seem nearly as quick as it should have. Maybe some dyno time and some TLC would sort it out a bit, but I thought it was a bit flat for what it is/was supposed to be.
Anyway, that's all for now. Any thoughts??
Last edited: