bmccrary
Touring Mod
Thank you for the reply Bryan!
As far as running lights go I wouldn't eliminate them for the safety factor they represent. The running lights and tail light should be on on the same circuit but a separate circuit from the headlamps. This configuration is for the safety factor/design in the event the headlamp circuit fails. This way the bike has twice the possibility of some kind of light in the event of one of the circuits failing. Naturally this type of failure would be more critical at night. I know our state (Ca.) requires running lights on the front. Some bikes have separate light assemblies for the running lights and some incorporate a dual filament 1157 type lamp in the front signal stalks as the FZ6 does. One filament is the running lamp and the other is the directional signal filament.
I totally agree we can get more power with smarter power management and better components. I would caution that it's a good idea to retain the front running lights for safety as well as legal reasoning.
There is a way to wire LED directionals and have both circuits available in the single function LED. See attached schematic.![]()
Good call! Or run a R1 pod light set up with LED's
But I do see what your saying. the only place I wouldnt use an LED is the tail light. Maybe they have improved on those, but I have yet to see a LED tail light that was bright enough for day time use.
-bryan